Publications

Fulltexts

All our publications are freely accessible to all. Most are openly available from the publisher’s website (gold open access; see [DOI] links below]), the remainder is made available here (green open access; see [PDF] links below). In some cases, only the author’s version can be shared (i.e., before copy-editing).

Open Data

Since 2018, all our papers have open data, materials, and analysis scripts available from the Radboud Data Repository (https://data.ru.nl), the Open Science Framework (OSF; see my profile) or other data repositories. See the [Dataset] links below.

Preprints

Preprints are early versions of scientific papers that have not yet been formally peer-reviewed. Hence, they are subject to change, should not be reported as conclusive, and are listed separately from peer-reviewed publications below. This also means we’re open to feedback and suggestions from interested readers. Send us your comments!

List of publications



(2026). The role of talker information in phonetic convergence. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, doi:10.1177/17470218261442873.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2026). Foreign language learners show a kinematic accent in their co-speech hand movements. Open Mind, 10, 66-78, doi:10.1162/OPMI.a.321.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2026). Contextual F0 cues can outweigh talker F0 cues in fricative perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 88 (132), doi:10.3758/s13414-026-03246-3.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2025). How strong is the rhythm of perception? A registered replication of Hickok et al. (2015). Royal Society Open Science, 12(6), 220497, doi:10.1098/rsos.220497.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2025). Beating stress: evidence for recalibration of word stress perception. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 87, 1729-1749. doi:10.3758/s13414-025-03088-5.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2025). Beat gestures made by human-like avatars affect speech perception. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2025, 5038-5042, doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2025-178.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2025). Beat gestures facilitate lexical access in constraining sentence contexts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/xlm0001524.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2024). Statistical learning at a virtual cocktail party. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 31, 849-861, doi:10.3758/s13423-023-02384-1.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2023). Sentential contextual facilitation of auditory word processing builds up during sentence tracking. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 35(8), 1262-1278. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_02007.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2023). Tracking talker-specific cues to lexical stress: Evidence from perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 49(4), 549-565. doi:10.1037/xhp0001105.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2022). Visible lexical stress cues on the face do not influence audiovisual speech perception. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022 (ed. S. Frota, M. Cruz, and M. Vigário), 259-263, doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-53.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2022). Encoding speechrate in challenging listening conditions: white noise and reverberation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 84, 2303-2318, doi:10.3758/s13414-022-02554-8.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2022). Acoustic correlates of Dutch lexical stress re-examined: Spectral tilt is not always more reliable than intensity. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2022 (ed. S. Frota, M. Cruz, and M. Vigário), 278-282, doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2022-57.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2021). The contribution of amplitude modulations in speech to perceived charisma. In Voice attractiveness: Prosody, phonology and phonetics (ed. B. Weiss, J. Trouvain, M. Barkat-Defradas, and J. J. Ohala), Singapore: Springer, 165-181, doi:10.1007/978-981-15-6627-1_10.

PDF Cite DOI

(2021). Listeners track talker-specific prosody to deal with talker-variability. Brain Research, 1769, 147605, doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2021.147605.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2021). Discourse markers activate their, like, cohort competitors. Discourse Processes, 58(9), 837-851, doi:10.1080/0163853X.2021.1924000.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2021). Beat gestures influence which speech sounds you hear. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288, 20202419, doi:10.1098/rspb.2020.2419.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2021). A tool for efficient and accurate segmentation of speech data: Announcing POnSS. Behavior Research Methods, 53, 744-756, doi:10.3758/s13428-020-01449-6.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Temporal contrast effects in human speech perception are immune to selective attention. Scientific Reports, 10, 5607, doi:10.1038/s41598-020-62613-8.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Spectral contrast effects are modulated by selective attention in ‘cocktail party’ settings. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 82, 1318-1332, doi:10.3758/s13414-019-01824-2.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Linguistic structure and meaning organize neural oscillations into a content-specific hierarchy. Journal of Neuroscience, 49(2), 9467-9475, doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0302-20.2020.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Knowledge-based and signal-based cues are weighted flexibly during spoken language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 46(3), 549-562, doi:10.1037/xlm0000744.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). How visual cues to speech rate influence speech perception. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(10), 1523-1536, doi:10.1177/1747021820914564.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Fluency in dialogue: Turn‐taking behavior shapes perceived fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 70(4), 1183-1217, doi:10.1111/lang.12416.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Eye-tracking the time course of distal and global speech rate effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 46(10), 1148-1163, doi:10.1037/xhp0000838.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Control of speaking rate is achieved by switching between qualitatively distinct cognitive ‘gaits’: Evidence from simulation. Psychological Review, 127(2), 281-304, doi:10.1037/rev0000172.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Contextual speech rate influences morphosyntactic prediction and integration. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 35(7), 933-948, doi:10.1080/23273798.2019.1701691.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2020). Biasing the perception of spoken words with transcranial alternating current stimulation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 32(8), 1428-1437, doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01579.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2019). Listeners normalize speech for contextual speech rate even without an explicit recognition task. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 146(1), 179-188 , doi:10.1121/1.5116004.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2019). How the tracking of habitual rate influences speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 128-138, doi:10.1037/xlm0000579.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2019). Deriving the onset and offset times of planning units from acoustic and articulatory measurements. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 145(2), EL161-EL167, doi:10.1121/1.5089456.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2019). Counting ‘uhm’s: how tracking the distribution of native and non-native disfluencies influences online language comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 106, 189-202, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2019.02.006.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2018). Talkers produce more pronounced amplitude modulations when speaking in noise. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 143(2), EL121-EL126, doi:10.1121/1.5024404.

PDF Cite DOI

(2018). Putting Laurel and Yanny in context. The Journal of the Acoustic Society of America, 144(6), EL503-EL508, doi:10.1121/1.5070144.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2018). Neural entrainment determines the words we hear. Current Biology, 28, 2867-2875, doi:10.1016/j.cub.2018.07.023.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2018). Listening to yourself is special: Evidence from global speech rate tracking. PLos One, 13(9), 1-19, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0203571.

PDF Cite Dataset DOI

(2018). Entrained theta oscillations guide perception of subsequent speech: Behavioral evidence from rate normalization. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience,33(8), 955-967, doi:10.1080/23273798.2018.1439179.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). Whether long-term tracking of speech rate affects perception depends on who is talking. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, 586-590, doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2017-1517.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). The role of temporal amplitude modulations in the political arena: Hillary Clinton vs. Donald Trump. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, 2228-2232, doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2017-142.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). How our own speech rate influences our perception of others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1225-1238, doi:10.1037/xlm0000381.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). Foreign languages sound fast: evidence from implicit rate normalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 8(1063), 1-13, doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01063.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). Cognitive load makes speech sound fast, but does not modulate acoustic context effects. Journal of Memory and Language, 94, 166-176, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.12.002.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). An entrained rhythm’s frequency, not phase, influences temporal sampling of speech. In Proceedings of Interspeech 2017, 2416-2420, doi:10.21437/Interspeech.2017-73.

PDF Cite DOI

(2017). Accounting for rate-dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 79, 333-343, doi:10.3758/s13414-016-1206-4.

PDF Cite DOI

(2016). Our own speech rate influences speech perception. In Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016 (ed. J. Barnes, A. Brugos, S. Shattuck-Hufnagel, and N. Veilleux), 227-231, doi:10.21437/SpeechProsody.2016-47.

PDF Cite DOI

(2016). Listening under cognitive load makes speech sound fast. In Proceedings of the Speech Processing in Realistic Environments conference [SPIRE], (ed. H. van den Heuvel, B. Cranen, and S. Mattys), 23-24.

PDF Cite

(2015). Normalization for speechrate in native and nonnative speech. In Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 2015, ICPhS XVIII (ed. M. Wolters, J. Livingstone, B. Beattie, R. Smith, M. MacMahon, J. Stuart-Smith, and J. Scobbie).

PDF Cite

(2015). Both native and non-native disfluencies trigger listeners’ attention. In Proceedings of the 7th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, DiSS (ed. R. J. Lickley, M. Wester, and R. Eklund).

PDF Cite

(2014). The processing and evaluation of fluency in native and non-native speech. PhD thesis, LOT dissertation series 353, Utrecht University, 175pp.

PDF Cite

(2014). The perception of fluency in native and nonnative speech. Language Learning, 64(3), 579-614, doi:10.1111/lang.12067.

PDF Cite DOI

(2014). Perceptual adaptation to segmental and syllabic reductions in continuous spoken Dutch. Journal of Phonetics, 46, 101-127, doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2014.06.004.

PDF Cite DOI

(2014). Native speakers’ perceptions of fluency and accent in L2 speech. Language Testing, 31(3), 349-365, doi:10.1177/0265532214526177.

PDF Cite DOI

(2014). Native ‘um’s elicit prediction of low-frequency referents, but non-native ‘um’s do not. Journal of Memory and Language, 75, 104-116, doi:10.1016/j.jml.2014.05.004.

PDF Cite DOI

(2013). What makes speech sound fluent? The contributions of pauses, speed and repairs. Language Testing, 30(2), 159-175, doi:10.1177/0265532212455394.

PDF Cite DOI

(2013). Sibilant consonants. In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics (ed. G. Khan), 557-561.

PDF Cite

(2013). Juncture (prosodic). In Encyclopedia of Hebrew Language and Linguistics (ed. G. Khan), 432-434.

PDF Cite

(2013). Choosing a threshold for silent pauses to measure second language fluency. In Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Disfluency in Spontaneous Speech, DiSS (ed. R. Eklund), 17-20.

PDF Cite

(2010). Whispered speech as input for cochlear implants. In Linguistics in the Netherlands 2010 (ed. J. Van Kampen and R. Nouwen), 1-14.

PDF Cite